Washington DC Employment Law Attorney Blog and Posts

Tour du Gab: Three State Bars, and Four Presentations to Them, in Six Weeks

Posted on November 15, 2018 by Richard T. Seymour

I do a fair amount of speaking, but the current six-week stretch is unusual. Annual Updates of Employment Law On October 27, Jeff Wohl from Paul Hastings in San Francisco and I did our usual annual two-hour update on employment law for the Arizona State Bar in Sedona.  It’s always fun working with Jeff.  Some might think we agree on too much —that’s the nature of employment law — but there is still good room for healthy disagreement.  One of the reasons I appreciate the Arizona State Bar inviting me back again and again is that I like the people, and I love the State and the desert.  I spent part of my childhood growing up in Arizona and I always love to get back. The annual update in Arizona is usually my last of the year.  It normally starts in April in Philadelphia for the Pennsylvania Bar Institute, where…
Read More »

Congratulations to Attorney Rick Seymour, Rated 2017 Top Lawyer by the Washingtonian!

Posted on February 2, 2018 by Design3

Please join us in congratulating Attorney Richard T. Seymour, who was recently rated one of 2017’s Top Lawyers by the Washingtonian! The Washingtonian is a monthly magazine distributed in the Washington, D.C. area, where Mr. Seymour practices employment law. Mr. Seymour’s practice involves four areas, each of which draws on his almost 50 years of experience. He represents employees in the U.S. and abroad in matters of harassment, retaliation and unjust accusations of wrongdoing. He also helps resolve disagreements as a neutral mediator. The Law Office of Richard T. Seymour was founded in 2005 in the hopes of providing legal services to a wide range of clients, acting as neutral mediators or arbitrators, acting as consultants for other law firms and providing expert legal evaluations in class-action lawsuits. Attorney Richard Seymour graduated from Harvard Law School in 1968 and has worked for civil rights and employee rights ever since. He…
Read More »

6 Legal Issues That Enable Serial Harassers

Posted on November 16, 2017 by Richard T. Seymour

Published by Law360 on November 16, 2017; posted with permission under license. Richard Seymour The questions raised in the public mind by the allegations against Bill Cosby, Roger Ailes, Bill O’Reilly, Harvey Weinstein and other powerful accused sexual and racial harassers are important: If the allegations are true, how did they manage to get away with it for so long? Why didn’t the victims complain earlier? Where were human resources and company compliance officers? Parts of the answers to these questions are clear, and the evidence of the enablers is not pretty. There is a common theme in many of the accounts given by harassment victims: fear. Fear of retaliation, fear of having a career destroyed, fear of being unemployable if the victim has a public record of having filed a harassment lawsuit, the fear of public humiliation as the most intimate and painful details of their lives are laid…
Read More »

How Arbitrators Maintain Proportionality In Discovery

Posted on October 24, 2017 by Richard T. Seymour

2017-10-20 How Arbitrators Maintain Proportionality In Discovery by Richard T. Seymour – Law360 The topics addressed are: The Federal Courts Are Following in the Footsteps of Arbitrators, Part 1 The Federal Courts Are Following in the Footsteps of Arbitrators, Part 2 Responding to Parties Who Blow off Discovery Requests: Suggestions for Best Practices in Court and in Arbitration Federal Courts Should Follow the Further Lead of Arbitrators as to Summary Judgments

One Defendant Compels Arbitration, Others “Wait and See”

Posted on August 29, 2015 by Richard T. Seymour

When a plaintiff sues a company or agency and its officials, and only the company or agency compels arbitration, does the arbitration-losing plaintiff get a “second bite at the apple” in the lawsuit, against the officials? Or do the officials get a low-risk chance to get out of the lawsuit without ever getting to the merits? And what happens if plaintiff wins the arbitration? Read the blog post for the answers. Continue reading

Do You Have a “For Cause” Employment Contract?

Posted on July 13, 2015 by Richard T. Seymour

Employees usually have the most rights under an employment contract that either says the employee will be employed for a specific period of time, or says the employer is restricting its ability to fire the employee to specific circumstances, such as “for cause,” with a definition of the term. Employers trying to recruit high-level managers, or persons with hard-to-find skills, find “for cause” agreements a powerful tool in persuading the desired prospects to leave what they were doing and sign up with the employer.

Continue reading