Category Archives: Washington DC Arbitration

Our employment lawyer is an arbitrator on the American Arbitration Association’s Commercial Arbitrator and Employment Panels. Read more about arbitration.

Attorneys’ fee awards where the recovery to the client is taxable (i.e., NOT personal injury cases)

There is a compelling tax reason to specify the amount of the recovery going for attorneys’ fees and expenses, in cases not involving personal injury. In other words, taking the position that “it’s none of the other side’s business” can be expensive for both sides. Continue reading

Posted in ADR for DC Employment Law Cases, Attorney's fees, Attorney's fees, DC Employment Agreements, Mediation for Employment Disputes, Taxes on Employment Law Recoveries, Washington DC Arbitration, Washington DC Employment Contracts | Tagged , | Leave a comment

New Supervisors: Common-Sense Pointers for Employers and Employees

By Richard T. Seymour www.RickSeymourLaw.com Copyright © 2010, Richard T. Seymour Better Ways of Managing Employment Disputes: Training New Supervisors Most employment disputes involving claims of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment, never make it to court. Employees choose not to pursue some disputes that far, or both sides reach a resolution before the EEOC or a State or local agency. Of the cases that do make it all the way into court, however, an astonishing number involve the actions of new supervisors. My personal perception is that employers, employees, and especially the new supervisors frequently mishandle the kinds of problems that predictably arise when a new supervisor is assigned. The result is a discrimination or retaliation complaint or lawsuit that could have been avoided. Why Are New Supervisors Assigned? There are three principal situations when a new supervisor is assigned, and the problems differ based on the situation. First, a new…
Read More »

Posted in Baseless Cases for Washington DC Employment Law, Discrimination in the Workplace, Federal Rules for Employment Law, Hostile Environment at Work, Meritorious Cases for Employment Law, Summary Judgment in Employment Law Cases, Washington DC Age Discrimination in Employment, Washington DC Arbitration, Washington DC Harassment On the Job, Workplace Retaliation | Leave a comment

Arbitration News: Sanctions for Misconduct in Arbitrations Under FAA Arbitration Agreements

By Richard T. Seymour www.RickSeymourLaw.com Copyright © 2010, Richard T. Seymour Case: Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp. et al. v. Camina Decided: September 13, 2010 By: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) Available at: http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/09/09-10355-CV0.wpd.pdf and 2010 WL 353001 Issue: When — (a) a Federal court orders arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement, (b) and not as part of a court-developed procedure under a local court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures or a special order in the case, (c) and counsel commit misconduct in the arbitration, (d) and the arbitrator had authority to issue sanctions for that misconduct, Does the Federal court have inherent authority to issue sanctions for the misconduct? Answer: No. The district court’s sanction of $10,000 against attorney Camina, representing part of Positive Software’s attorneys’ fees, was reversed. Limitations: The court’s holding is: — Limited to misconduct occurring…
Read More »

Posted in Baseless Cases for Washington DC Employment Law, Federal Rules for Employment Law, Meritorious Cases for Employment Law, Washington DC Arbitration, Workplace Retaliation | Leave a comment